雅思大作文高分范文-废料循环利用效果差的原因：
There is no doubt that people’s health will be influenced directly or indirectly by the environment and housing condition. Whether governments should focus more on the environment and estate has triggered a controversy. I feel that individuals should take more responsibility for their well-being other than governments’ increasing attention.
Indeed, the environmental problems and housing conditions are two main sources for illness and diseases. In many large cities in northern China，haze weather has become a daily killer，especially causing respiratory diseases in winter. Also，populace will easily access to viruses and bacteria if they live in a poor housing condition without any advanced sanitation. Therefore，governments should give more attention and higher investment in these two areas.
Compared to individuals, governments have more power to arrange a wide range of social resources to address severe issues; however，it does not mean that addressing this problem totally depends on governments. The state is an organizer or a coordinator in our society instead of a responsibility taker. Although governments can claim people to enhance the awareness of environment protection，make policy to strengthen the environment management and invest estate where they need, public health condition is still a personal problem to some degree. People have the obligation to form and keep a healthy and positive lifestyle, or they will still face the threat of illness and diseases even the environment and housing condition getting better.
In conclusion, people also need to take responsibility of their well-being as governments only hold a position as organizer and coordinator. The most feasible solution may be that governments provide a fine setting on one hand and public should pursue a healthy lifestyle for themselves on the other hand.
雅思大作文高分范文-儿童看电视的好坏：
Nowadays, the overwhelming popularity of TVs in our lives has been a heated social issue in debate. Some people suggest children should be encouraged to watch TV. Personally, I partially agree with this assertion, and my reasons will be explored as below.
Admittedly, this assertion is problematic, because it overlooks the potential risks TV sets bring to students. Firstly, the primary goal of children's life is studying, which is exclusive from the entertainment purpose of TV programs. In other words, fancy pictures and videos in TV, from an advertisement to a sporting spot, are a tremendous disturber that seriously distracts children from focusing on the teacher and textbooks. Therefore, by watching TV, students’ general interests and efficiency in studying would be lowered sharply. Secondly, watching TV weakens children's desires and interpersonal skills for socialization with other peers. As long as the emergence of TV, all children would do is no more than pinning themselves in front of this machine and staring at pictures on the screen, with no time or attention spent on communication with people around. That is to say, Watching TV steals children's time that could be spent on interaction with peers, or outdoor exercise.
However, I agree that watching TV at home is beneficial to children. For one thing, TV is an ideal stress reliever. After a hard-studying day in school, watching one-hour cartoons on TV can effectively help children relax their minds, get rid of physical exhaustion and mental problems like frustration and discouragement accumulated in school, as well as recover positive attitudes towards challenges of tomorrow. Therefore, the function of TV to stabilize emotional well-being of children is irreplaceable. In addition, TV is a valuable tool of complementary education, which can teach these young viewers practical knowledge absent in school classes. For example, all kinds of channels about food, wild camping and finance can equip children with skills of cooking, first aiding and money planning.
In conclusion, watching TV in different occasions has opposite influences on children. In my view, TV should be banned in school, in terms of its distraction on studying and social activities. As for watching TV at home, however, I believe it can bring many benefits to after-school children.
雅思大作文高分范文-政府要不要确保个人过健康的生活：
Who should decide the residents’ life style? From my perspective, it is individuals’ right to choose what sort of life they take.
Currently, there exits two main thoughts about who make decisions for our lives. Some people convince that it is government’s duty to decide residents’ lifestyle which i cannot agree with even though it has an intention to make people’s life healthier. Apparently there would not be benefits for both the authorities and citizens since the government can hardly get to know what an individual prefer most, therefore the money from the government would be invested in a wrong way with a result of a decrease of local economy. Citizens, meanwhile, can also get seldom advantages since he cannot do what he is fond of and then, as a consequence, a sense of unsatisfying would occur which can result in many negative facts such as disliking to work, having no passion of life or catching emotional disease, etc.
Another voice that i consider appropriate is that the right to choose a life model should be given to individuals. It is evidently no one has a deeper understanding about a person’s preference compared with himself and what differs from the first view is that is is needless for the government to integrate the public’s lifestyle thereby saving no matter the money or the time. The reason is that there is no need to build a vast number of facilities which have no attractions to the public which should be spent much money and at least several months.
On balance, i support that all the people owe to be permitted to live their own lives. By doing this, the maximum of freedom can be distribute to the public and the number of conflicts between governments and citizens would decrease.